Journal of European Economic Association, Vol. 2, Issue 4, June 2004, pp. 634-664. (with Michael Baker and Emily Hanna)

Marriage penalties are a controversial feature of many government policies.  Empirical evidence of their behavioral effects is quite mixed, which is surprising because economic theory predicts that they should have an impact on the headship decision.  We investigate the removal of marriage penalties from the surviving spouse pensions of the Canadian public pension system in the 1980s.  These reforms provide a simple and transparent source of identification.  Our results indicate that marriage penalties can have  large and persistent effects on marriage decisions.  We also present evidence suggesting that it is individuals with characteristics correlated with greater wealth who respond to the penalties.

Read Full Paper